Our agenda is organized in three branches, each addressing specific problems while sharing questions about contingency, communal practices, and language.
Each branch has designated coordinators and teams. The branches share problems and methods.
We explore the pragmatist canon—especially Dewey, James, and Rorty—to rethink democratic institutions and situated justification practices.
We study how testimony, disagreement, and institutional trust shape knowledge production in plural societies.
We investigate semantic inferentialism and philosophical pragmatics to understand how meaning guides legal and civic practices.
We hold regular seminars, writing workshops, and research projects funded by UBA, CONICET, and SADAF. Each branch organizes its own activities—colloquia, reading groups—and shares results in joint meetings.
We collaborate with researchers in Argentina, the United States, and Europe, and participate in regional networks such as the Latin American Legal Epistemology Network.
Contingencia