Logo Contingencia
ES
Grupo de Epistemología y Semántica Pragmatista

Thinking contingency from Buenos Aires

Research group based at the University of Buenos Aires, CONICET, and SADAF, working on social epistemology, pragmatism, and philosophy of language.

How we work

Collaborative research

Joint projects with UBA, CONICET, and SADAF connect epistemology with contemporary problems.

Training

Workshops and reading groups support graduate students and create open discussion spaces.

Public philosophy

Outreach activities and dialogue with legal institutions.

Research areas

Our work is organized in three branches: pragmatism, social epistemology, and philosophy of language. Each branch has distinct projects but shares problems and methods with the others.

B1

Pragmatism and American Genealogies

We explore the pragmatist canon—especially Dewey, James, and Rorty—to rethink democratic institutions and situated justification practices.

Coordinators
Federico Penelas
Team
Mauro Santelli, Bruno Muntaabski
Current topics
  • Intellectual history of pragmatism
  • Politics and deliberative democracy
  • Epistemic communities across Latin America
B2

Social & Contemporary Epistemology

We study how testimony, disagreement, and institutional trust shape knowledge production in plural societies.

Coordinators
Federico Penelas, Florencia Rimoldi
Current topics
  • Collective justification and shared evidence
  • Legal epistemology and standards of proof
  • Politics of knowledge and inequality
B3

Philosophy of Language & Semantic Normativity

We investigate semantic inferentialism and philosophical pragmatics to understand how meaning guides legal and civic practices.

Coordinators
Mauro Santelli, Bruno Muntaabski
Current topics
  • Inferentialism and normativity
  • Contextualism and semantic disagreement
  • Applied philosophical pragmatics

Why Contingencia?

The name comes from pragmatist philosophy and the idea that knowledge is built from historical, social, and material contexts. Following Richard Rorty and John Dewey, we study how contingency shapes the standards by which we justify beliefs and practices.

The three branches work together: pragmatist debates inform social epistemology, while research on semantic normativity raises questions about epistemic justice.

Selected publications

Recent articles and chapters that illustrate our intersection of social epistemology, pragmatism, and language.

  • 2025

    Robert Brandom and Political Theory (Special Issue Editors)

    Santelli, Mauro, Huetter-Almerigi, Yvonne · European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy

  • 2025

    Testimony and Non-Evidential Reasons for Belief (A Non-Purist Place for Interpersonalism)

    Rimoldi, Florencia, Penelas, Federico · Episteme

  • 2025

    The Right to Irony

    Penelas, Federico · European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy

View all publications